Vainalpregnant Womenimages

Social cleansing, cleaning animal

is daytime. A group of men laughing in unison, while the truck that transported the course leads to his amusement. His words of gibberish is not understood, but denote joy, satisfaction and joy. The truck stops and men toiling down, while the shouts and laughter become more intense.

The viewer will soon see the reason for his joy, when in the hands of one man is a resident of the street, with a look of confusion deepens as it hit, insult , and screaming. The scene is repeated and again: the 'poor' are persecuted, threatened, beaten with stones, undressed, wet, humiliated. The men laugh. (see video)

is day again. Three men are just as happy to previous How to describe such high levels of joy! The enjoyment you live close to the surface, although we are not there with them. Hermoso video appeal: we can show vividly convey the joy and feelings this trio of psychopaths to torture a dog, who dies and ends up hanged in a hole, listening on the eve of breath heavy laughter.

In these men, players of different situations, but with similar characteristics, there are more commonalities than those described above. They are not part of social welfare ministries, are not part of any humane society, are not part (if there's restlessness) of former Convivir groups undertaking such activities without any retaliation from justice. (see video)

are part, as you know the public aware of the institution called the protection of colombianos, a la defensa del patrimonio y la integridad común, a la protección de los derechos humanos, tan pisoteados por ellos, sus legítimos defensores.

Miembros de la Policía se ven una vez más involucrados en escándalos de abusos del poder. Pero para suerte de ellos y de la institución que representan, los nuevos abusos no tienen como víctimas a animales indefensos, ni mucho menos a personas. Los vulnerados son indigentes.

Y no me malinterpreten,  no es que tenga la certeza de que los habitantes de calle son menos que animales y menos que personas. Todavía I have the doubt, because Colombia is a society that cries, protests and condemns the police for mistreatment of a bitch but that, given the abuse of several human beings, can only give a small voice of rejection.

the dog's death by three policemen wounded was a fact that all kinds of sensibilities. Within hours crammed social networks, and repudiation of comments the next day, the murder became a phenomenon that pervaded all media: radio, print, television.

5 minutes of torture canine achieved what could not be more than 10 minutes of multiple abuse in humans: increasing the sensitivity of the Colombian people, capable of exploding with tears solo a bitch, but immovable when confronted with massacres and rape.

The consequences of this lethargy of the public are often the same: General Oscar Naranjo out on TV saying that the necessary corrective measures be taken to find the perpetrators of these "moles" within the institution . And if we allow comparison histrionic, moles of the National Police would raise the suspicion of a dangerous virus "Dalmatians.

Diseases s like this, appearing ever more frequently in the media, can not be solved with small press or with the occasional reaction of citizens in social networks. The abuse that we are witnessing (and sometimes victims) requires a social cleansing and animal to the Police, an institution that seems to have no psychological or filter (let me so bold) biological.

@ rincondesantos

Mtg Perfect Mana Curve

Is there conflict in Colombia? Ideas

The pronouncement of President Juan Manuel Santos, perceiving in Victims Act the existence of an armed conflict in Colombia, sparked a controversy at odds with the precepts of democratic security.

As expected, the leading opponent of such recognition was the former president, Alvaro Uribe Velez, who said on Twitter that "recognition of the conflict is to recognize the legitimacy of the terrorists." Santos met him immediately to the criticism, noting that his decision has nothing to do with the Colombian guerrillas to political status.

However, despite strong manifestaciones de Uribe y la firme posición de Santos, éste es un debate en el cual existe una teorización bien construida que deja a uno de los dos con clara desventaja en la exposición sus argumentos.

El Comité Internacional de la Cruz Roja (CICR), en un documento publicado en 2008 y titulado “¿Cuál es la definición de "conflicto armado" según el Derecho Internacional Humanitario?”, despeja muchas de las dudas y confusiones que el ex presidente Uribe ha querido  sembrar al revivir esta discusión. Allí se citan los Convenios de Ginebra de 1949 (de los cuáles Colombia hace parte) para explicar en qué condiciones se considera that a country suffers from what is known as NIAC (NIAC).

As is well exposed in the article, the term armed conflict in which a dispute "involving one or more non-governmental armed groups." But it also gives the title to the territory where the government is fighting other armed groups, a hierarchical and territorial domain. The same happens when the state "has to resort to military force against the insurgents, instead of relying solely on the police force."

Considering the current state of order American public, there are great similarities between the Geneva Conventions and the armed conflict in Colombia, since long before the government of Alvaro Uribe, Colombia has been the scene of territorial disputes that have faced guerrillas and right-wing armies as the AUC.

However, the former president uses his achievements of "eradication" of the paramilitaries to clarify that such disputes are "a thing of the past." Argument does not work for you, if you consider that an armed conflict also occurs when military forces fighting the insurgency, as explains the ICRC.

Uribe would have to deny, then, the existence of a hierarchical and the FARC guerrillas, fighting the organization and employment of the Armed Forces of Colombia (pillar of security democratic) to fight against what he called terrorism.

But it does not, not only because he knows that is not true, but because it is aware that it would disrupt the reckless speech has given him so many followers. That is why , despite knowing the implications the conflict, prefer to change the label, creating misinformation in the national public opinion and creating a climate of fear among Colombians.

This does not mean he is unaware of the Geneva Conventions, but prefers to ignore. And ignored the recidivism schematic of paramilitaries in Colombia and the killing of the Armed Forces who, incidentally, also fall into the triggers for recognition of the conflict.

However, his recent pronouncements have a different character verging on helplessness, it is not Uribe, who makes the decisions, but Santos. And with the recognition that the President made the conflict not only reaffirms the distance with the previous government, but evidence of a change in national security policy, more respectful of the ICRC and international humanitarian law.

@ rincondesantos

(for more on armed conflict, visit the blog of Daniel Afanador)