From there began the meeting with himself to be existentialist, share a present state because we are, because we are. That is the abstraction to understand the potential value of our time in life that we hold and behind all the machinery of the reality of existence is the subsequent combination of vague details that disappear in a futile return of our decisions. The apparent shape of the contrasts that drive to be going nowhere, and the relevant figure in our ability to react to the guidelines of our innermost desires and all that spinning and having its own independence and considering that tomorrow is there, I imagine you awake, and awake without knowing why I'm here, the reason for my existence and me.
Well here's an existentialist self-expression, as it is the easiest way to express myself as an existentialist. This philosophical movement involves a number of ways in dealing with life, and worldview brings a somewhat decentralized in explaining human life or handle. Does the existentialist point of view is irreconcilable with the Christian worldview? To begin to answer this question we must define in a way that is existentialism. It is said that existentialism is a philosophical movement whose central tenet is that human beings are, individually are those who create their own meaning and essence of their lives
Well I do not intend to introduce all the details of this philosophical school, which will in other writings on the subject, so if you intend is to refute some points of this definition.
1-man main postulate.
existentialism
When judging the character of human existence that part, what standard used to establish that it is absurd or not absurd, when discussing existentialism and proposes solutions to the problems inherent in the human condition, as the absurdity of life, the significance and insignificance of being, the dilemma of the war, life and death, freedom physics and metaphysics, the nature of man, God and hombre.La question is where part atheistic existentialism to establish an objective opinion on matters that are outside of yourself, we have established in this way that only God gives a rational answer to the dilemmas of life, but as existentialism is atheistic not take this into account and colliding with an uncertainty of not giving absolutely no response to what we stand for.
2 - individual who create their own meaning.
One of the more subtle errors is when the man wants to find meaning in their own standard and not a standard that is out of himself, when human beings create their own meaning, creating no end no meaning in itself, I explained in this way when a person decides to be an alcoholic as an existentialist that person just creating their own meanings and all patterns that may exist, what I propose is that the human being is not truly their own standard meaning only God gives meaning to human. Meaning has to do with meaning and purpose and existentialism does not meet these two premisas.En if today there is no intellectual or philosophical existentialist like Sartre or Camus, but there are many practical existentialist, millions of people seeking meaning of its existence in its own standard, millions of people looking for answers where do not exist, millions of people who are on one side to another if he cares if God exists or cares about them, so we conclude that the atheistic existentialism is inrreconsiliable with theistic existensialismo.
0 comments:
Post a Comment