how some truths are taken to reinforce a point of view and how others should ignore them because in some way are not part of my interests. The idea is, we can accept some truths and ignore others.
The following example says it all. Some time ago while reading the newspaper to see if there was something worthy of my eye I see a title that caught my attention. The newspaper headline said so "Zapatero: " Do not oppress a hired servant, your life depends on his wages "the title referred to a visit of the President Spain José Luis RodrÃguez Zapatero at the event called National Prayer Breakfast held the White House all the years in February. President Zapatero in his speech quoted a Bible verse, what? "Do not oppress a poor laborer needed, either one of your countrymen or foreigners who live in one of the cities of your country. Pay him his wages on the same day, before the sun sets, because it is needed and your life depends of his reward. Deuteronomio24: 14.15 . He cites the leading English newspaper that refers to the text to illustrate the situation of workers, note that it is a good text to draw attention to issues social, but it really completes the appointment? In this same direction, the article makes mention of this detail, pointing out that Shoemaker does not quote the text completely, but omits the last part, which says "not to cry against thee unto the Lord, and it be sin unto thee . " Notable no! omitted the most important part of the text, which is certainly not Moses who exhorts, but is directly God who calls, involving direct consequences against those who ignore the social mandate, the implications are of divine origin not just a human law as presented by caring nature this head. But let's see what the other point. In the English leader's speech made the following statement which claimed "the right of everyone to moral autonomy and to live with the loved one", something that has been linked to tolerance and freedom. "It's freedom that we makes people and citizens, and we can look to the future and know the truth, "Zapatero stressed as opposed to hatred," born of ignorance . " When the English leader speaks of moral autonomy gives way to something that it advocates, gay marriage, although not directly mentioned in his speech made an appeal for tolerance and respect for difference, se. Notable contradiction I can cite some biblical passages, but ignore others who decry this practice, it appears that the president forgets that the God who said the violation of social standards in the Bible, also designated as violation invalidates the moral standards ( relativism is notable.) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of Dios.1corintios 6:9. What would Zapatero about this verse? ! I can imagine, intolerance!, is a word much used today to indicate those who are against the current immoral society. Moral autonomy rather absurd way in which nations have committed the violation of God's standards. What you sow that you reap the same . Let's see how the moral autonomy is a categorical absurdity of a philosophy of unbridled debauchery. The reality is that, in Spain the statistics say that the numbers of abortions are increasing. Since 1995 there is a 40% increase in the number of abortions. 100,000 are estimated from 2007 . But that preaches moral autonomy Zapatero and we tolerate it. There are absolute values \u200b\u200band direct consequences when you go against those absolute values. Companies today are obvious examples of this reality. God holds the irresponsible attitude of choosing a permissive moral model.
The following example says it all. Some time ago while reading the newspaper to see if there was something worthy of my eye I see a title that caught my attention. The newspaper headline said so "Zapatero: " Do not oppress a hired servant, your life depends on his wages "the title referred to a visit of the President Spain José Luis RodrÃguez Zapatero at the event called National Prayer Breakfast held the White House all the years in February. President Zapatero in his speech quoted a Bible verse, what? "Do not oppress a poor laborer needed, either one of your countrymen or foreigners who live in one of the cities of your country. Pay him his wages on the same day, before the sun sets, because it is needed and your life depends of his reward. Deuteronomio24: 14.15 . He cites the leading English newspaper that refers to the text to illustrate the situation of workers, note that it is a good text to draw attention to issues social, but it really completes the appointment? In this same direction, the article makes mention of this detail, pointing out that Shoemaker does not quote the text completely, but omits the last part, which says "not to cry against thee unto the Lord, and it be sin unto thee . " Notable no! omitted the most important part of the text, which is certainly not Moses who exhorts, but is directly God who calls, involving direct consequences against those who ignore the social mandate, the implications are of divine origin not just a human law as presented by caring nature this head. But let's see what the other point. In the English leader's speech made the following statement which claimed "the right of everyone to moral autonomy and to live with the loved one", something that has been linked to tolerance and freedom. "It's freedom that we makes people and citizens, and we can look to the future and know the truth, "Zapatero stressed as opposed to hatred," born of ignorance . " When the English leader speaks of moral autonomy gives way to something that it advocates, gay marriage, although not directly mentioned in his speech made an appeal for tolerance and respect for difference, se. Notable contradiction I can cite some biblical passages, but ignore others who decry this practice, it appears that the president forgets that the God who said the violation of social standards in the Bible, also designated as violation invalidates the moral standards ( relativism is notable.) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of Dios.1corintios 6:9. What would Zapatero about this verse? ! I can imagine, intolerance!, is a word much used today to indicate those who are against the current immoral society. Moral autonomy rather absurd way in which nations have committed the violation of God's standards. What you sow that you reap the same . Let's see how the moral autonomy is a categorical absurdity of a philosophy of unbridled debauchery. The reality is that, in Spain the statistics say that the numbers of abortions are increasing. Since 1995 there is a 40% increase in the number of abortions. 100,000 are estimated from 2007 . But that preaches moral autonomy Zapatero and we tolerate it. There are absolute values \u200b\u200band direct consequences when you go against those absolute values. Companies today are obvious examples of this reality. God holds the irresponsible attitude of choosing a permissive moral model.
0 comments:
Post a Comment